The Central Administrative Court has ordered a luxury condo to stop construction and revoked the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report and construction permit of the 125 Sathorn project on South Sathorn Road.
The case was filed by the co-owner of The Met Condominium (which is located on the same plot of land) by Ms. Chitchanok. Lert Amphonpaisarn The Met condominium juristic person's manager said that The Met filed this case against several government agencies involved in approving the EIA report and issuing construction permits for the 125 Sathorn project.
The Met claims that Pebble Be Thailand, the developer of The Met Project, originally owned a 10-rai piece of land. Later, in 2004, Pebble Be Thailand divided the said land into two plots: Land 7 rai
Related news:
Kanda invades the housing market in the Samut Sakhon area. Send premium I-Leaf Prime Setthakit-Bang Pla
CP Land joins forces with 17 partners to launch a campaign to stimulate final sales.
The Central Administrative Court revokes construction of the 125 Sathorn project.
for the construction of The Met project and 3 rai of land, which is the land where the 125 Sathorn project will be built. Currently, the land is owned by PMT Property Company Limited, a joint venture between Toh Company. Resenthai Agencies Public Company Limited and two Japanese company partners, namely Kanden Realty & Development Company Limited and Toray Construction Company Limited. Toray Construction Company Limited
Because the two plots of land have already been used to apply for construction permission for The Met project, the entire 10 rai of land is under land use for the construction of high-rise buildings or extra-large buildings, in this case, The Met has claimed. that the building design of 125 Sathorn is larger than the building size required by law After subtracting the land area of The Met from the 10 rai area.
The Central Administrative Court's decision in this case, which comes after verdicts in several luxury condominium cases, including Ashton Asoke, shows that the court is giving greater weight to the concerns and litigation of surrounding communities at risk of being condoned. Huge construction projects obscure it all.
In this case, the Central Administrative Court relied on its legal authority and ordered the revocation of approval of the EIA report and construction permit of the 125 Sathorn Project with retroactive effect. which this judgment This should be another way for responsible agencies to consider and find a legal mechanism that better protects the rights of communities that have existed here before, so that filing a lawsuit seeking to rely on the court's authority will occur only in the case of Except rather than being a normal practice.
Source:https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/property/1092833
Date: 9/10/2023